November 15th
Medical Doctor retracts vaccine advice after reading insert
The following video highlights a retraction made by a medical doctor, Dr. Roby Mitchell, after he initially advised a group of nurses to take the H1N1 Swine Flu vaccine. Once he had read the actual package insert which comes with the vaccine and realized that the vaccine makers themselves admit it is untested and may cause a myriad of disorders to include paralysis, neurological damage, possible sterilization and may cause fetal harm in pregnant women (one of the high priority groups targeted to get the vaccine), he retracted his advice so that they would have informed consent.
His reading of the insert also revealed that an adjuvant called MF 59, which is similar to the squalene molecule found in our normal nerve tissue, is indeed in the H1N1 vaccine after we’ve been told that adjuvants had been removed. We need more doctors like this one in our country who use their common sense and not talking points from the media and pharmaceutical industry when giving advice to their patients and colleagues. My sincere compliments go out to Dr. Mitchell.
Watch the video here.
/ Kevin Copenhagen, PrisonPlanet.com
Eight deaths in Sweden reported due to swine flu jab
The Swedish government’s medical products agency has said that it has received reports of 8 people dying in connection with GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix swine flu jab from doctors and patients so far.
There is no requirement to report deaths and side effects from the swine flu jab in Sweden even though it has not been tested. A GSK study in the UK on the side effects of the GSK jab is considered adequate for Sweden. The lack of proper monitoring has sparked fears that the 8 deaths are just the tip of the iceberg.
The Swedish medical product agency has downplayed the link between the swine flu vaccine and the deaths, saying that people who died shortly after taking the jab were seriously ill from other diseases.
However, the chronically ill were one of the vulnerable group targeted for the swine flu jab on the grounds that they would derive an especial benefit from it. The results of only four autopsies on people who died after taking the Pandemrix jab in Sweden are known.
“Autopsy results are available for four of the cases and in all these cases a relation between the vaccination and the death is considered unlikely,” writes the medical products agency. It is not clear how many people in Sweden have taken the swine flu jab making an assessment of how risky the jab is impossible.
The Swedish government has said that 2.4 million doses have been distributed but that it has no figures on how many jabs have actually been given with some medical sources reporting that only 150,000 jabs have been administered so far in Sweden.
To read the Swedish medical products agency report on deaths and side effects associated with the swine flu jab, click here.
Korneuberg prosecutor stays silent on reasons why he dropped the Baxter case
On Wednesday, I sent the Korneuburg state prosecutor Christian Pawle an email asking to see the files on his investigation into Baxter’s contamination of 72 kilos of seasonal flu vaccine material with the live bird flu virus to assess what the basis for his decision to drop the case against Baxter was.
A memeber of the Korneuburg prosecutor’s office told me on the phone on Wednesday it was possible, in principle, to see the files. I asked for a reply by the end of Wednesday about whether I could see the files, but have so far received no information.
Questions that need to be answered include:
- How could 72 kilos of seasonal flu vaccine material be contaminated with the live bird flu virus when strict biosafety level 3 precuations are in place at Baxter’s lab in Orth an der Donau close to Korneuburg that require the bird flu virus to be keep in siolation at all times in a separate lab etc?
- What was the exact sequence of events that led to the accidental contamination of the material as Baxter maintains?
- What records has Baxter maintained of the incident? Are the records complete?
- Why did Baxter have the bird flu virus in its facilities in Orth an der Donau in the first place when it is a production and research facility not connected with the bird flu?
- What type of bird flu virus was it? Was it genetically engineered?
- Why did WHO give Baxter the virus?
- How come the vaccine material with the live bird flu virus left the facilities without being properly radiated?
- How come it was sent under a false label to 16 labs in Austria, Germany, Slovakia and the Czech Republic via Avir in Vienna?
- How come Avir and a Czech lab, BioTest, have said the end purpose of the material was for use in regular flu vaccines when Baxter maintains it was research material?
- Why was the contaminated vaccine material returned to Baxter?
- What has happened to the contaminated vaccine material?
/ Jane Bürgermeister
Go back: Headlines - The Vaccination News
Read more:
Understanding the Illuminati - Part 1
The Truth about the Swine Flu - four essential articles
The Vaccine Information War - Mainstream Media vs Truth
Open Letter to all Corporate Media Journalists
Go back: